On a Method to Measure Supervised Multiclass Model’s Interpretability: Application to Degradation Diagnosis (Short Paper)
No author records on this work.
In an industrial maintenance context, degradation diagnosis is the problem of determining the current level of degradation of operating machines based on measurements. With the emergence of Machine Learning techniques, such a problem can now be solved by training a degradation model offline and by using it online. While such models are more and more accurate and performant, they are often black-box and their decisions are therefore not interpretable for human maintenance operators. On the contrary, interpretable ML models are able to provide explanations for the model’s decisions and consequently improves the confidence of the human operator about the maintenance decision based on these models. This paper proposes a new method to quantitatively measure the interpretability of such models that is agnostic (no assumption about the class of models) and that is applied on degradation models. The proposed method requires that the decision maker sets up some high level parameters in order to measure the interpretability of the models and then can decide whether the obtained models are satisfactory or not. The method is formally defined and is fully illustrated on a decision tree degradation model and a model trained with a recent neural network architecture called Multiclass Neural Additive Model.
What this paper cites, inside the corpus
| Paper | Year | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| Explaining prediction models and individual predictions with feature contributions | 2013 | 2,302 |
What cites it, inside the corpus
Links
Topics
| Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) | Computer Science |
| Machine Learning and Data Classification | Computer Science |
| Bayesian Modeling and Causal Inference | Computer Science |
Is this record sound?
partial
One field of this record is missing or disagrees with another. What is shown below is what the source publishes.
- weakensThe source lists no authors for this work at all, so there is nobody to attribute it to and it appears on no author page.
- supports9 reference(s) recorded.
- supportsThe DOI's year agrees with the publication year.
- supportsA title is present.
Provenance
sha256 7e3d99a592f7f61f…